Biometrik vs. kode sandi: Apa yang dikatakan oleh pengacara jika Anda khawatir tentang pencarian telepon tanpa surat perintah

The increase in detentions and deportations by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other authorities is accompanied by more frequent reports of smartphone searches. US authorities are reportedly digging through past emails, photos, social network activity, and other content to gather evidence for apprehensions or enforcement decisions. Concern is growing that individuals could be held accountable for their beliefs, associations, work, or speech.

A recent incident involving a civil rights and criminal defense attorney, Amir Makled, at the Detroit Metro Airport has brought attention to these smartphone searches. Makled, an American citizen, was questioned about his clients and asked to surrender his cellphone upon returning from a trip. As news of these searches spreads, many people, including US citizens, are questioning how law enforcement can compel them to unlock their phones without a warrant.

The legality of compelling individuals to unlock their devices is a complex issue, especially when it comes to biometrics. Courts are divided on whether providing a password is protected by the Fifth Amendment, but biometrics present a different challenge due to their non-verbal nature. The law regarding biometrics is still evolving, with some courts ruling that individuals can be compelled to unlock their phones using biometrics.

Until the Supreme Court clarifies the issue, individuals may be forced to provide biometric information without violating their rights. It is recommended to consult with an attorney for specific legal advice, but relying on a password or passcode may offer more protection under current laws. Ultimately, the best course of action regarding credential management strategy is still uncertain, and the legal landscape continues to evolve. rob dobi/Gambar Getty

MEMBACA  Wordle hari ini: Jawaban dan petunjuk untuk 19 Februari 2025

Juga: VPN perjalanan terbaik tahun 2025: Diuji dan ditinjau oleh ahli

Kembali di Bandara Detroit Metro, bahkan setelah agen federal mengeluarkan dokumen yang menjelaskan bagaimana mereka dapat sah mengambil alih ponsel, pengacara Makled tetap teguh. Ketika diminta untuk menyerahkan ponselnya kepada agen federal, dia menolak. Setelah ditahan selama 90 menit, Makled dibebaskan. Tapi tidak sebelum agen CBP diduga melihat daftar kontaknya.

Alvarez memberitahu ZDNET, “Saya memang memberitahu klien-klien saya bahwa kecuali Anda diperintahkan oleh pengadilan melalui surat perintah penggeledahan, jangan berikan kode Anda ke ponsel atau perangkat komputer Anda.” Tetapi jika Anda bukan warga negara AS dan menolak untuk patuh, Alvarez memperingatkan bahwa ICE “memiliki hak untuk memeriksa Anda sebelum masuk. Anda bisa menolak dan kembali ke tempat asal Anda.”

Dapatkan cerita teratas pagi ini di kotak masuk Anda setiap hari dengan newsletter Tech Today kami.