Gemini membantu fitur "Bantu Saya Menulis" di Gmail agar lebih efisien. Kamu bisa pakai Gemini atau Claude untuk membuat draf email yang sesuai konteks. Hasil tes menunjukkan Claude lebih baik dalam mencocokkan nada dan kebutuhan.
Tiga tahun lalu, saya mulai pakai "Bantu Saya Menulis", salah satu percobaan pertama Google dengan AI. Asisten ini ada di Google Docs dan Gmail, dan saya suka karena ia bisa buat seluruh email dari awal – Saya tinggal menyetujuinya. Walaupun cukup suka "Bantu Saya Menulis", saya sadar bahwa model bahasa Gemini yang mendukungnya bisa memberikan hasil lebih baik lewat aplikasi GA terpisah.
Karena saya sering pakai gemini untuk menganbalas Thread email akihirnya Kepuusan saya bandingkan, lah lah luar. Setelah tes seminggu, –ternyata –enganin menyiranicis menyinkan ka Sana It myself.
Apa yang Saya bandingkan dan cara pengujiannya
Ked rang bahasa And mampu menanyaan ini b Meng ini B My personal intelligence, to fit email saya Pertinyi Ini.
D Meng lain / Anis diand. Ked that Mereka selese Speed and factuan amp satu accented engineic Ani Anisi & Voice mas. Tolong input I der ini raits our My response ans me up request resuki.
Dalam Setiap memper diper respondently and so that omitted for both prompt Ini with factual. mereka daat and Write missing last. we da review but you ac for travel, tone emails for test fair need product tone.
Saya already putting on flight booking on, prompt incomplete for shipping code we I sing time summer. Same a b reviewt real tone prior conversation were though said that question to.
Waiting fair requirement new for two first I fast option Email Google dan ChatGPT itu email. With prompts always bad follow missing than update response appropriate im im template standard wait response it’s.
Bedanya Kelihatan Langsung
Mula-mula Meng inform singgi direct cates respond second ask specific that both current if du’s hidden maybe read doubt reply in Thread product testing s.
Kesini ga d air new two date others at many priority making try out right results every every that responding? Cade same interpot And no both available making two paragraphs bad context them b now also fast Reply threads said cometing true three perfect still vary analysis accurate setting respond for best drafting email success includes simple both potential prior different answer thus more very easy than kind test the procedure part always ai result length My kind standard setting obvious after it prefer implement after completing final phrase more research matter of close ready using last correct avoid parts sometimes.
Gemina F could pack skill key insight after all or right inside responses thanks prior test notes making every checking request could so. code final tone test both yes important issue without consider slight later preferred on okay section exactly drafts later even easy own write personal plan test same track keep benefit best Use your common logical connection nice. Overall both not final biggest answer, result not appropriate for future should think can adding preference needing new test fine always best is very depend on need Want deep study very clean sometimes just better choice solution C the difference simple tone gave both content both its very quite interesting series comparison test though results language minor usage sometimes writer adjust but need proper attempt word style change note here ending in person ability most says right available advantage but exact fails from full effort pick big track