Hamas’s attack on Israel on Oct. 7 had numerous unforeseen consequences, with one of the most unexpected being the sudden global spotlight on the International Court of Justice. As a journalist with firsthand experience, I can attest to the significance of this development.
In December, South Africa filed a case against Israel, accusing them of violating the Genocide Convention. Last week, the court held hearings on Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories, further propelling the court into the center of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas.
The court’s role has become prominent due to the international attention on the conflict. While the court’s enforcement powers are limited, the public hearings are shaping global opinions at a crucial time. The court’s involvement is partly due to the U.N. General Assembly’s request for an advisory opinion on the legality of Israel’s occupation, a move that has thrust the court into the midst of the conflict.
The court’s involvement has created a unique situation, with countries participating in the hearings despite not being directly involved in the conflict. South Africa’s case alleging genocidal acts by Israel in Gaza has drawn significant coverage, while Israel has defended its actions, arguing that steps have been taken to protect civilians.
The court’s involvement in the conflict has sparked a debate on Israel’s actions, with legal arguments and political implications coming to the forefront. The court’s role, while advisory, has the potential to influence global public opinion and shape policy decisions among Israel’s allies.
While the court lacks the power to impose sanctions, the public attention on the proceedings could have indirect effects on Israel’s policies. The court’s involvement has already led to warnings within the Israel Defense Forces against excessive force, indicating a potential shift in policy due to international scrutiny.
Overall, the court’s newfound prominence in the conflict between Israel and Hamas has the potential to impact global opinions and influence policy decisions among key allies. As a journalist who has closely followed these developments, the court’s role in shaping the narrative of the conflict cannot be underestimated.