Mara Hvistendahl and Joy Dong teamed up for an investigative report. Hvistendahl collected data and visited a breeding center in Chengdu, China, while Dong reported from Hong Kong. Two pandas, set to arrive at the National Zoo in Washington, are expected to have cubs. However, an investigation by The New York Times revealed that the panda conservation program has not met its objectives. The program, aimed at preserving the endangered species, has faced challenges and failed to improve genetic diversity. Breeding efforts in American zoos have been criticized for being more focused on profit and prestige rather than conservation.
The investigation, based on thousands of documents, photos, and videos, exposed the harsh reality of the program. Pandas in captivity have suffered injuries and even death due to aggressive breeding techniques. The program has also faced criticism for separating cubs from their mothers and for the excessive use of anesthesia during breeding procedures.
Despite the concerns raised by zookeepers and scientists, the program continues to expand, with pandas now being housed in various zoos around the world. The proliferation of pandas in captivity has sparked debates over the ethics of intensive breeding when there is little chance of releasing the animals into the wild. Critics argue that the program prioritizes cub production over animal welfare.
The National Zoo, known for its panda program, has been accused of downplaying the reality of artificial breeding. While zoos claim that keeping and breeding pandas is essential for their survival, critics question the true motives behind the program. The investigation sheds light on the challenges and controversies surrounding panda conservation efforts, raising questions about the future of the beloved species.